Knicks win NBA Cup as Wembanyama struggles in 124-113 final loss

New York claimed their first trophy since 1973 after overcoming San Antonio in Las Vegas, with Victor Wembanyama posting a team-worst -18 plus-minus in 25 minutes.

By James O'SullivanPublished Dec 17, 2025, 12:33 AMUpdated Dec 17, 2025, 12:33 AM

DR

Advertising

When pre-game comments age poorly

Victor Wembanyama told national television hours before Tuesday's NBA Cup Final that the Knicks "don't play very sophisticated basketball," contrasting it with San Antonio's "pure and ethical" style. The Knicks responded by demolishing that theory, beating the Spurs 124-113 in Las Vegas to claim the tournament's third edition. Wembanyama's comments provided bulletin board material that New York clearly used, and his performance—18 points on 7-for-17 shooting with a team-worst -18 plus-minus—suggested the physical reality of the game didn't match his pre-game confidence.

This wasn't the Wembanyama who dominated Oklahoma City in the semifinals with a +21 rating in just 20 minutes. This was a player still finding his rhythm after missing a month with a calf strain, limited to 25 minutes again but lacking the decisive impact that defined San Antonio's semifinal upset. He scored 10 points in a furious two-minute stretch during the third quarter, but outside that burst, he struggled—missing 10 shots, committing five turnovers, and getting dominated on the glass by Mitchell Robinson's relentless offensive rebounding (10 offensive boards for Robinson alone).


The Knicks' physical approach overwhelmed San Antonio

New York didn't win with sophistication—they won with physicality, rebounding, and timely shotmaking. The Knicks grabbed 23 offensive rebounds to San Antonio's 18 total defensive boards, creating second-chance opportunities that repeatedly killed Spurs momentum. Robinson was a menace on the glass, OG Anunoby scored 28 points on aggressive drives and timely threes, and Jalen Brunson orchestrated everything with 25 points and eight assists despite shooting just 11-for-27. That's not pretty basketball—it's effective basketball, the kind that wins when talent levels are relatively equal.

San Antonio led heading into the fourth quarter 94-89, built on balanced scoring (seven players with 11+ points) and defensive effort that frustrated New York for three quarters. Then the Knicks opened the final period with an 8-0 run featuring two Jordan Clarkson threes, and the Spurs never recovered. San Antonio chased the game unsuccessfully, watching the deficit grow to 11 despite their best efforts to mount a comeback. That fourth-quarter collapse exposed exactly what Wembanyama was criticizing—sometimes brute force and execution matter more than sophistication.


Wembanyama's return from injury remains incomplete

This was Wembanyama's second game back after missing a month with a calf strain. He played 20 minutes against Oklahoma City and delivered a +21 performance that felt miraculous. Against New York, he played 25 minutes and posted a -18 rating that reflected how much the Knicks targeted him defensively and exploited his limited conditioning. Coming off the bench again (though entering after just five minutes), Wembanyama looked out of rhythm for long stretches—his shot selection was questionable, his defensive positioning inconsistent, and his decision-making rushed.

The physical toll of playing high-intensity games after a month off is real. Wembanyama might have the talent to dominate when healthy, but he's clearly not there yet. His first half was invisible—four points, four rebounds, minimal defensive impact. His third-quarter explosion (12 points) gave San Antonio hope, but it was an outlier rather than a sustainable performance level. The Knicks recognized this and attacked him relentlessly, forcing him into uncomfortable situations where his lack of game conditioning became obvious.


What this loss reveals about the Spurs' timeline

San Antonio's run to the NBA Cup Final was impressive given their youth and Wembanyama's injury absence, but this loss exposed their current limitations. They can compete with elite teams for stretches, but they don't yet have the depth, experience, or physical maturity to close out games against veteran opponents who know how to exploit weaknesses. The Knicks are a playoff team with multiple All-Star-caliber players and years of postseason experience. The Spurs are a promising young team still learning how to win meaningful games.

That's not a criticism—it's reality. Wembanyama is 21 years old and just returned from injury. His supporting cast is developing but not yet reliable in high-pressure moments. San Antonio's coaching staff is still figuring out rotations and matchups on the fly. This experience will help them long-term, but it's also a reminder that contending for championships requires more than just one generational talent. The Knicks had Brunson, Anunoby, Robinson, and multiple contributors who delivered when it mattered. San Antonio had Wembanyama and hope, which wasn't enough Tuesday night.


New York's first trophy since 1973

For the Knicks, this NBA Cup represents their first trophy in 52 years—a drought that's defined the franchise for multiple generations of fans. Yes, it's "just" the NBA Cup, not an actual championship, but tell that to the players celebrating on the court or Spike Lee cheering in the stands. After decades of disappointment, false hope, and rebuilds that went nowhere, New York finally won something tangible. That matters psychologically even if it doesn't carry the same weight as a Larry O'Brien Trophy.

The $531,000 prize money each player and staff member receives is nice, but the validation of winning a competitive tournament matters more. Brunson got his signature moment as the Knicks' leader. Anunoby proved he's more than just a defensive specialist. Robinson showed why his rebounding intensity changes games. And the three French players on the roster—Guerschon Yabusele, Mohamed Diawara, and Pacôme Dadiet—didn't play but still collect rings and checks. That's depth, that's organizational strength, and that's why the Knicks were better Tuesday night.


The lesson Wembanyama needed to learn

Wembanyama's pre-game comments about "sophisticated basketball" reflected youthful confidence that hadn't yet been tested by reality. The Knicks didn't play sophisticated basketball—they played winning basketball, which is far more important. They rebounded, executed in crunch time, and imposed their physicality on a younger, less experienced opponent. That's not elegant, but it works. And Wembanyama, for all his talent, learned that talking about style means nothing if you can't back it up with performance.

This loss will sting, especially given how close San Antonio came to pulling off another upset. But it's also a valuable lesson in humility, preparation, and the gap between potential and consistent excellence. Wembanyama has the talent to dominate the NBA for the next decade. But he still needs to learn when to speak, when to stay quiet, and how to deliver when his words create expectations he's not yet ready to meet. The Knicks just taught him that lesson the hard way.

JO
James O'Sullivan

James is a former english academy coach with 15 years in youth development. He watches football like a chess match—he sees what's about to happen three moves before it does. He writes about young talent, system-building, and why some clubs consistently develop world-class players while others waste potential. He's equally comfortable analyzing a 16-year-old's decision-making as he is critiquing a manager's squad construction. Based in London, he's brutally critical of Premier League hype cycles.