Real Madrid and Barcelona collect over €150M each in TV rights jackpot

LaLiga distributed €1.432 billion in broadcast revenue for 2024/25, with the Spanish giants dominating while French clubs struggle with minimal TV deals.

By David ChenPublished Dec 23, 2025, 7:50 AMUpdated Dec 23, 2025, 7:51 AM
Advertising

When two clubs take nearly a quarter of the entire pie

LaLiga announced its broadcast rights distribution for the 2024/25 season, revealing a total pot of €1.432 billion—slightly down from last season's €1.498 billion. Real Madrid leads with €157.52 million, narrowly ahead of Barcelona's €156.45 million, despite both clubs experiencing overall revenue declines. Atletico Madrid sits third with €108.17 million, down from €117.89 million last season. Together, the top two clubs alone pocket over €310 million, representing more than 21% of LaLiga's entire broadcast revenue. That concentration of wealth creates a competitive imbalance that's impossible to ignore.

The rest of Spain's top division shares €1.292 billion collectively, down from €1.351 billion last season. Only a handful of clubs saw increases: Girona (Champions League qualification), and promoted sides Espanyol, Valladolid, and Leganes. Everyone else—from Sevilla to Getafe—took cuts. LaLiga's distribution system starts with an equal base payment for all clubs, then allocates the remainder based on sporting performance over the past five seasons and commercial appeal. But even with that structure, the gap between the elite and everyone else remains enormous. A small minority captures the majority of revenue, leaving mid-table and lower clubs with scraps.


The contrast with France's TV disaster

Comparing LaLiga's broadcast riches to Ligue 1's struggles is almost painful. French clubs are dealing with minimal TV rights after last season's fiasco when the previous broadcast deal collapsed and Ligue 1+ took over, paying clubs only a few million each. Real Madrid and Barcelona individually earn more than €150 million from TV rights. Most Ligue 1 clubs would celebrate getting a fraction of that. The disparity isn't just about league popularity—it's about negotiating power, historical prestige, and the commercial appeal of having two of football's most iconic brands competing domestically.

French football's TV rights disaster stems from overvaluation, failed negotiations, and a broadcaster market that couldn't sustain inflated prices. Spain avoided that trap because LaLiga's clubs—particularly Real Madrid and Barcelona—drive global viewership that justifies premium pricing. Broadcasters pay billions to show El Clasico and watch these clubs compete in Europe. France doesn't have that same draw internationally, which means their TV deals will always be worth less unless PSG somehow builds a rivalry that captures worldwide attention the way Real-Barca does. That's not happening anytime soon.


Why Real Madrid and Barcelona dominate revenue

Real Madrid and Barcelona's €150+ million TV payouts aren't just about sporting success—they're about brand power that transcends football. These clubs have global fanbases, massive social media followings, and commercial appeal that makes broadcasters willing to pay premium rates for their matches. LaLiga's distribution formula rewards sporting performance over five seasons and commercial strength, both areas where Real and Barca dominate. Even when Barcelona struggles on the pitch, their commercial appeal keeps revenue high. Same with Real Madrid, whose Champions League pedigree and star power guarantee eyeballs regardless of domestic form.

The system is designed to reward historical success and marketability, which means the rich get richer while smaller clubs can't break through. Girona qualifying for the Champions League earned them a bump, but it's a temporary boost that disappears if they fail to maintain that level. Real Madrid and Barcelona's advantages are structural and permanent—they'll always attract more viewers, sell more merchandise, and command higher broadcast fees. That creates a cycle where financial dominance reinforces competitive dominance, making it nearly impossible for anyone else to catch up without massive external investment.


The sporting performance vs commercial appeal split

LaLiga's distribution model allocates revenue based on two main factors: sporting results over the past five years and commercial performance. That sounds fair until you realize that "commercial performance" heavily favors clubs with existing global brands. Real Madrid and Barcelona have spent decades building worldwide followings that generate massive broadcast interest. Smaller clubs can't replicate that overnight, even with strong on-field performances. Athletic Bilbao might finish top-four and play attractive football, but they'll never match Real Madrid's commercial appeal because they don't have the same history of Champions League success and global star power.

This system ensures competitive balance never truly exists in LaLiga. The top clubs can afford better players because they earn more revenue, which helps them win more trophies, which increases their commercial appeal, which generates more revenue. It's a self-reinforcing cycle that locks mid-table clubs into perpetual mediocrity unless they find a billionaire owner willing to inject capital or develop an exceptional academy that produces multiple elite talents simultaneously. Neither scenario is common, which means the status quo persists: Real Madrid and Barcelona dominate financially, Atletico hovers as a distant third, and everyone else fights for scraps.


Why the €1.432 billion total matters less than distribution

LaLiga generating €1.432 billion in broadcast revenue sounds impressive until you examine how it's distributed. If the money were split more evenly, Spanish football would be more competitive because mid-table clubs could afford better squads. But the current system concentrates wealth at the top, meaning clubs like Getafe, Osasuna, or Rayo Vallecano operate on budgets that are a fraction of what Real Madrid and Barcelona spend. That creates a talent gap that's impossible to overcome through coaching or tactics alone. When one team can afford a bench worth more than another club's entire squad, competitive balance disappears.

The slight decrease from €1.498 billion last season to €1.432 billion this year suggests broadcasters are reassessing LaLiga's value, possibly due to declining viewership or competition from other leagues. If that trend continues, it could force LaLiga to reconsider its distribution model or risk losing relevance as other leagues invest in more balanced financial structures that create genuine competition. But realistically, Real Madrid and Barcelona will resist any changes that reduce their revenue share, and LaLiga won't risk alienating its two biggest brands for the sake of competitive balance.


The promoted clubs' temporary windfall

Espanyol, Valladolid, and Leganes all saw revenue increases simply by virtue of being promoted to LaLiga. That makes sense—broadcast payments in Spain's top division dwarf what Segunda Division clubs receive. But those bumps are temporary unless these clubs establish themselves as consistent top-flight competitors. Most promoted sides struggle to survive beyond one or two seasons, and when they get relegated, their TV revenue collapses. That creates a yo-yo effect where clubs bounce between divisions, never accumulating enough wealth to build sustainable squads.

Girona's Champions League qualification also earned them a significant bump, but maintaining that level is incredibly difficult when competing against clubs with three times your budget. One good season isn't enough to break into the elite permanently. Clubs like Villarreal and Real Sociedad have managed to stay competitive through smart management and player development, but they're exceptions. Most mid-table Spanish clubs accept their position in the hierarchy because the financial gap is too large to overcome without extraordinary circumstances or ownership willing to lose money pursuing sporting success.


What this means for competitive balance in Spain

LaLiga's broadcast distribution ensures Real Madrid and Barcelona will dominate Spanish football indefinitely unless something fundamentally changes. Atletico Madrid can occasionally challenge due to smart recruitment and Diego Simeone's system, but even they operate on a budget significantly smaller than the big two. Everyone else is fighting for Europa League spots or survival, with no realistic path to winning the title unless both Real and Barca simultaneously collapse. That's not competitive balance—it's a two-team league with occasional disruptions.

Fans of smaller clubs might argue they're happy just surviving in LaLiga and occasionally upsetting the giants, and that's fine. But from a competitive integrity standpoint, a league where two clubs earn three times what most others receive isn't healthy long-term. It creates predictable outcomes, reduces drama, and makes domestic success less meaningful because everyone knows who the favorites are before the season starts. LaLiga remains entertaining because of the quality at the top, but the financial structure guarantees that quality stays concentrated rather than spreading throughout the league.

DC
David Chen

David is a data journalist and former software engineer who applies analytics to football like few others do. He's not interested in "expected goals" as a meme-he builds custom models that actually predict performance, identify undervalued players, and expose tactical patterns. He covers MLS, Champions League, and international competitions with the same statistical rigor. He's based in San Francisco and believes American soccer fans deserve smarter analysis than they usually get.